We read everything that is written about you.
Then we change what comes next.
Silver Eye responds to hostile information campaigns with fast, evidence-based analysis of how a client is described across the open web. We focus on the points where disinformation and coordinated amplification distort the record — especially in Google search results.
Reputation treated as a field of evidence, not as advertising.
We approach reputation as a set of documents that can be tested. Each article, blog post and search snippet is treated as a data point in a wider storyline about the client. Our work begins with reading, classifying and questioning those texts under time pressure.
The objective is not to make the internet flattering. It is to ensure that courts, regulators, counterparties and serious journalists encounter a coherent and factually defensible account when they research a name that is under attack.
Mandates typically arise in the context of information warfare against a client: orchestrated press campaigns, mirrored accusations on dozens of small sites, or search pages dominated by unverified claims. Our role is to document what is happening and build the basis for a coordinated response.
Investigative reading and structured counter-narrative.
Our practice borrows from investigative journalism, academic source criticism and legal case-building. We reconstruct how a story about the client emerged, who amplified it and which documents or rumours it rests on.
Instead of issuing generic denials, we identify misquotations, translation chains, circular sourcing and fabricated “evidence”. Where appropriate, we prepare material that can stand up in court, before regulators and in serious media — and that quietly rebalances what appears in search.
Working model
Rapid collection of articles, blogs, search results and social posts across relevant languages and jurisdictions.
Written analysis of narratives, risks and factual fault lines — formatted for immediate use by legal and regulatory teams.
Discreet content work, targeted requests and platform procedures designed to remove or displace defamatory material.
Evidence aligned with defamation, privacy and platform law.
Many of our projects involve, or quickly lead to, litigation and regulatory complaints. We therefore structure our findings so that they can be used directly by lawyers specialising in defamation, privacy, media law and data protection.
We are not a law firm and do not provide legal advice. We work alongside counsel, supplying them with organised dossiers, chronologies, comparative tables and media-forensic reports that document the coordinated nature of a campaign.
What we provide to counsel
- Mapping of defamatory ecosystems: origin sites, mirrors, aggregators and translation chains.
- Analysis of timing, clustering and technical markers that indicate coordination rather than independent reporting.
- Side-by-side comparisons between allegations and primary documents or official records.
- Evidence packages suitable for defamation claims, GDPR erasure and DSA notice-and-action procedures.
What crisis-driven work can look like.
Each mandate is custom-built, but most combine intensive short-term analysis with targeted interventions in search, media and regulatory channels.
Crisis monitoring
Focused monitoring of specified outlets, domains and platforms for new or resurfacing accusations, with triage between background noise and developments that require immediate escalation.
Narrative and network reconstruction
Rebuilding the chronology behind a hostile storyline: first publication, replication waves, language versions, and the network of sites involved.
Search-result remediation
Supporting legal and regulatory steps aimed at removing or de-indexing unlawful content and strengthening the presence of verifiable, non-defamatory material in search.
Technical and media-forensic briefs
Commissioning and coordinating external expert reports where needed, and integrating their findings into a coherent evidential picture.
Quiet coordination
Aligning communications, legal and digital actions so that each step reinforces the others and does not inadvertently amplify the campaign.
Short, defined engagements
Most projects run in tight cycles: intense analysis and action during the acute phase of an attack, with clear handover to ongoing legal and monitoring structures.
Engagements and discretion.
We work with a limited number of clients. All enquiries are handled through private channels only.